simulated small intestinal fluid (sif) Search Results


simulated intestinal fluid (sif) instant powder  (Biorelevant.com)
90
Biorelevant.com simulated intestinal fluid (sif) instant powder
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif) Instant Powder, supplied by Biorelevant.com, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/simulated+intestinal+fluid++sif++powder/pmc06572106-75-0-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif) instant powder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
simulated intestinal fluid (sif  (Ricca Chemical Company)
90
Ricca Chemical Company simulated intestinal fluid (sif
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif, supplied by Ricca Chemical Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/Simulated+Intestinal+Fluid+TS/10__1097_slash_cad__0000000000000173-54-7-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
simulated intestinal fluid sif  (Shanghai Macklin Biochemical)
86
Shanghai Macklin Biochemical simulated intestinal fluid sif
Simulated Intestinal Fluid Sif, supplied by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/intestinal+juice+simulated/pmc12385531-48-0-7
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluid  (Fisher Scientific)
86
Fisher Scientific fluid
Fluid, supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/fluid+scintillation/pm42123342-182-12-19
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
simulated gastric intestinal fluids (sgf sif  (Biorelevant.com)
90
Biorelevant.com simulated gastric intestinal fluids (sgf sif
Simulated Gastric Intestinal Fluids (Sgf Sif, supplied by Biorelevant.com, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/fasted+state+simulated+intestinal+fluid++fassif++powder/pmc11314731-66-3-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated gastric intestinal fluids (sgf sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluid sif  (Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals)
86
Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals fluid sif
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Fluid Sif, supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/fluid+gastric+simulated/pmc13067824-37-7-12
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluid sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
simulated intestinal fluid (sif  (FUJIFILM)
90
FUJIFILM simulated intestinal fluid (sif
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Intestinal Fluid (Sif, supplied by FUJIFILM, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/simulated+intestinal+fluid++sif/pm38145927-55-15-22
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid (sif - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
simulated intestinal fluid  (Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology)
86
Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology simulated intestinal fluid
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Intestinal Fluid, supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/fluid/pm41722795-49-0-11
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluid  (Thermo Fisher)
99
Thermo Fisher fluid
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Fluid, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/Tween+20/pm40932412-63-63-166
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sif powder original (fassif/fessif/fassgf powder, lot 02-1405-09)  (Biorelevant.com)
90
Biorelevant.com sif powder original (fassif/fessif/fassgf powder, lot 02-1405-09)
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Sif Powder Original (Fassif/Fessif/Fassgf Powder, Lot 02 1405 09), supplied by Biorelevant.com, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/sif+powder/pm28619610-35-0-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sif powder original (fassif/fessif/fassgf powder, lot 02-1405-09) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
simulated body fluid s sgj simulated gastric juice sif simulated intestinal fluid sln s  (Brookhaven Instruments)
86
Brookhaven Instruments simulated body fluid s sgj simulated gastric juice sif simulated intestinal fluid sln s
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Simulated Body Fluid S Sgj Simulated Gastric Juice Sif Simulated Intestinal Fluid Sln S, supplied by Brookhaven Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/body+fluid+fluid+gastric+intestinal+juice+s+s+sgj+sif+simulated+simulated+simulated+sln/10__1007_slash_s11051___018___4425___x-11-17-1
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated body fluid s sgj simulated gastric juice sif simulated intestinal fluid sln s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
calcium chloride dihydrate (cacl2.2h2o)  (BioShop)
90
BioShop calcium chloride dihydrate (cacl2.2h2o)
Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by <t>simulated</t> <t>intestinal</t> <t>fluid</t> <t>(SIF)</t> at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).
Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (Cacl2.2h2o), supplied by BioShop, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulated+small+intestinal+fluid+(sif)/cacl2/10__1007_slash_s11694___022___01691___w-51-44-63
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
calcium chloride dihydrate (cacl2.2h2o) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Oral Celastrol Nanomedicine Targeting Intestinal Antigen‐Presenting Cells to Effectively Mitigate Autoimmune Uveitis via Gut‐Retina Axis

doi: 10.1002/advs.202519503

Figure Lengend Snippet: Preparation of nanoCEL and its immune‐modulation properties in vitro. (A) Schematic fabrication of nanoCEL; (B) Effect of drug/polymer feed ratio on the mean particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoCEL; (C) The optical (inset) and TEM images of nanoCEL; (D) Particle size distribution, zeta potential, loading capacity (LC), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of nanoCEL; (E) In vitro release profiles of nanoCEL under varied pH conditions (PBS, pH = 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5) at 37°C for 120 h (n = 3; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. pH = 1.5); (F) In vitro stability of nanoCEL in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) at 37°C for 2 h, followed by simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) at 37°C for 6 h (n = 3); (G) CLMS images and flow cytometry analysis of JAWSII dendritic cell uptake of various formulations after incubation for 15 min. Nile Red (NR) fluorescence is depicted in red. (n = 6; ns indicates no significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. blank group); (H) IL‐6, IL‐12p70, and CXCL5 levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated JAWSII dendritic cells after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (I) NO, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels in the cell culture medium of LPS‐stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages after treatment with 200 n m free CEL and 200 n m nanoCEL; cells without any manipulation set as blank group (n = 4; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001). (J) Western blot analysis of CD206 and Arg‐1 levels from each group (n = 3; *** p < 0.001 vs. LPS‐stimulated group; ### p < 0.001).

Article Snippet: Simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) were purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio‐Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China).

Techniques: In Vitro, Polymer, Zeta Potential Analyzer, Encapsulation, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Fluorescence, Cell Culture, Western Blot